Lovelock’s climate punt : part 1

{Updated: 05.07.12}

I’m reasonably sure at least some subscribers to this web site and blog are wondering about my opinion about James Lovelock’s ‘flip’ in his  position about abrupt climate change as represented in his recent interview with MSNBC.

Well, I do have an opinion, and will offer it here asap.  I’m still gathering data – or at least trying to – about what, exactly, his new position is.  Either he’s being quite vague about it or the author of the linked article is being vague  - which leaves me asking, “OK, so what does he mean,  exactly?”   Yet outside of that interview and several stories written about it, I’m finding nothing to clarify his position, especially not on his own web pages.

I’ll just say this for now, with more to come at a later time as my understanding increases:

  1. The way that he is handling this is a great annoyance to me; I think he’s being irresponsible to not offer more clarification, and his self-labeling as an “alarmist” annoys  me to no end.  I hold a view similar to his former opinion, but refuse to label myself (or allow myself to be labelled) ‘alarmist’, which I consider a pejorative term, especially when used by deniers and obfuscators.   A person shouting “Fire!” in a burning building is not an ‘alarmist’, nor is a person trying to help others understand global heating and abrupt climate change driven by it.   As a result, he has at least temporarily fallen out of my “very admired scientist” category into …. some other category that I shouldn’t name until I cool down a bit.
  2. Hypotheses and speculation is running rampant about his motivation for advancing his  new position, and unfortunately, not all believe it’s entirely grounded in science.  (I’ll list some of those in part 2.)
  3. Once again I am reminded that ‘argument from authority‘ is a logical fallacy: every argument must be evaluated on its own merit, regardless of who’s advancing it.  Lovelock is no exception.  Even though I think his Gaia theory and geophysiology (aka Earth system sciences) are brilliant, I’m going to seriously question his new stance on climate.   I’m open to the possibility that he’s right, but I need to first understand his reasoning, and why he seems to be missing some HUGE changes that are underway.
  4. However, to the extent that I  understand his new position, I’m finding that I agree more with his former position than the new one.  I was never 100% sold on every aspect of his former position as laid out in, say, his book Revenge of Gaia – I’m not as ‘dark’ in my prognosis as he is, and I explicitly disagreed with some of his ‘solutions’* – but I certainly cited his views a lot in my lectures and seminars, holding them out as one plausible  possibility in a range of possibilities, some better, some worse.  [* When I teach my advanced seminar about Gaia using that book, we only read the first 4 chapters on the theory itself, not the remaining chapters on 'solutions'.  Even though I agreed with some of his arguments in those latter chapters - like him,  I'm not a fan of big wind farms for many of the same reasons - and could see the logic in others, I chose not to identify with his positions outside of Gaia theory, geophysiology and abrupt climate change.]
  5. With a group of current students, I have begun to re-evaluate my position on abrupt climate change with respect to his former position , and will continue to do so in summer and with the help of one or prominent, internationally-known researchers in abrupt climate change.  More on that another day.

More to come … please stay tuned ….

Posted in Climate, Education, Gaia, Science, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Abnormal heat, Margulis memorial, then …

Happy Spring Equinox … a day late.

March 21 : today’s forecast high temperature for here in Waterville ME is 76F with a heat index of 78F.  I’m willing to bet it’ll hit 80F downtown here where most surfaces are covered by asphalt.  [Added by edit: the official temp here today was 84F.]

The normal (average) maximum for this day is 44F, with the previous high of 62F set in 1979.  Another one bites the dust.

And of course, this abnormal excursion – which began here in Maine last Sunday while I was up in Dexter offering a weekend version of Gaia 101 : Understanding Abrupt Climate Change Using System Sciences and Geophysiology – is an international event.  How perfect was the timing, right?

So, right now, I’m sitting in my Waterville apartment overlooking down town with windows open and a fan on as I put finishing touches on my presentation for this weekend’s memorial conference for Lynn Margulis in Amherst MA.  At 7 am Friday, I will hop the first bus on a 9-hour ride from Augusta to Amherst via Boston.  (There are no shorter routes for those of us without a personal vehicle.)  I have five minutes at the memorial to offer a “reflection” piece, for which I am deeply honored.

Next Monday, I will take the return bus trip back to Augusta (then 30 miles back to Waterville), and will begin scheduling lectures and seminars for the month of April.  I’ll post that schedule in my calendar page asap.

In addition, I’ll soon be announcing the birth of a new non-profit organization based around Gaia 101. It’s called the Climate Adaptability Project (CAP).   We’re working on the new web site now.

Please stay tuned …

_________

PS: The Margulis memorial conference was wonderful and inspiring on several levels.  Saturday and Sunday (morning) included some of the best science lectures I’ve ever heard, mostly in 15 minute chunks, by many who studied with, researched with or were at least influenced by Lynn’s work.   My 5 minute “reflection” piece was well received, even if my delivery was not as strong as I’m capable of.  The lectures were punctuated by lots of real emotion, oscillating between laughter and tears.  I’m planning to write a review as soon as time allows.   Given my accelerating workload, that may take a while …

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Brigid & Imbolc

I must take a moment out of my focus on science, climate change, and such, to acknowledge the passing of my favorite day of the year: Brigid or Imbolc, February 2.  (Technically, Imbolc is the name of the celebration that happens on that day in honor of Brigid.)

I was not able to celebrate it properly yesterday, which was very busy.  I offered a public lecture then about my Gaia 101 seminar (system sciences, geophysiology and abrupt climate change) in Waterville, ME, the first of three lectures there in the next 11 days. (The next two are Feb 9 at Barrels and Feb 13 at Waterville Public Library.)  Preparing for and offering that occupied my entire day.

Yet Brigid, or Imbolc, is a day that is more important to me than Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Years Eve, Easter, July 4, Valentine’s Day, my birthday, and Super Bowl Day {tm}.

Some call it Candlemas (a more Christianized version) or ‘Groundhog day‘ (secularized). But being Scots-Irish and a student of mythology, I prefer the names ‘Brigid’ or ‘Imbolc’.

Let me explain why it’s such an important day for me.

First, I’ll own this: I’m not a religious person.  I call myself a spiritual atheist.  I do not believe in a sentient god (or pantheon) that humans can petition with prayer.  In general, I don’t like religion because I don’t like dogma, especially dogma that does not evolve as human understanding of reality evolves.

But I am a spiritual person, at least when using a definition of spirituality that I learned from Fritjof Capra.  In his book The Web of Life – which I used as an introductory text for my system sciences courses for a few years around 2002 – 2005, until I found more update texts – Capra defines spirituality thusly (paraphrasing since I don’t have the book with me on my travels): it is the acknowledgement that one is a part of something larger than oneself.  He does not invoke the concept of deity, and argues – like I do – that it’s not necessary to do so.

IMO, one does not need to invoke any kind of ‘meta’-physics to be spiritual, either, meaning one does not need to invoke principles, forces, energies that are outside of contemporary sciences like physics and chemistry.  And I do not.  My spirituality is grounded in and emerges from my science, not the other way around.  (I am planning at least one blog/post essay here soon that will address my strong concerns about things “new age”, the pseudosciences, but I’ll not address that here.)

If I ever used the word ‘god’ in referring to my spiritual views – and I rarely if ever do outside of a context like this – I would use it sensu Baruch de Spinoza, the 17th century philosopher who argued that ‘God’ IS the laws of physics, is not sentient, does not care one whit about humans (or any other species), and is not even capable of caring anyway, because it is not sentient.  But in general, I stay away from use of the words “god” and “goddess” unless speaking about mythology ala Joseph Campbell.   In my view, they are simply metaphors, not metaphysical realities.

I tend to follow a natural calendar of the year.  I am forced by my culture to use the Julian calendar for business and every day life, but I don’t like it.  I’ve written in the past about how January 1 is an arbitrary starting point for a new year when it really begins about 10 days earlier at winter solstice.  That’s when the days shift from getting shorter to getting longer and sun begins its return north.

Brigid, mythically and metaphorically named after an Irish goddess, but was later woven into Christian mythology also, is – in the jargon of ancient, pre-Christian mythologies – a cross-quarter day, the half way point between a solstice and an equinox.  In this case, it is half way between winter solstice (Yule) and spring equinox, an ancient European name for which was Eostar, later co-opted by Christians, who changed its spelling and moved it to a later day to usurp the power of the day among non-Christian people; they did the same with Yule, also, and at least two other days.   (I’m not trying to start a religious war; I’m just acknowledging historical realities.)

Brigid or Imbolc is celebrated – at least in the northern hemisphere – as the beginning of the return of spring, when days get noticeably longer even if temperatures won’t get warmer for weeks yet.  It’s all about the light, and the promise of the return of spring and green.

I’ll celebrate Brigid today, February 3.
Gaia doesn’t care since it’s not sentient either.

Happy Brigid and Imbolc to all.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

An open letter to Maine communities about my lecture & seminar on abrupt climate change

[Updated June 1, 2012.]  This is an open letter to Maine commmunities to help you understand why I have developed my 2-hour lecture and 12-hour seminar about abrupt climate change, and why they are important and relevant to your community.

The bottom line is that by mid-century or before, and continuing far beyond 2100, because of abrupt, chaotic and extreme climate change that can no longer be stopped, Earth will effectively become a different planet.   Food production – and much else – in most regions of the world will be greatly hampered.

I’m willing to be wrong about my prognosis; on most levels, I hope that I am.  But evidence is increasing daily, indeed, accelerating, that my view – a synthesis of the work of many scientists – is correct.   The bizarre, extreme weather in 2011 and the beginning of 2012 in Maine and across the US and Earth is just the beginning of more drastic changes to come more quickly than most are expecting, let alone prepared for.  As a society, we have not yet grasped the scale, speed and severity of the changes probably coming our way.

But the good news is that although Maine will not be spared from huge changes, it is a good place to be relative to most of the ‘lower’ 48 United States.   And my motivation for teaching this seminar – and others that extend from it – is that if we understand what is coming, we can prepare and make the transition far more effectively.  This is especially important for those with children in their lives, because they will face the biggest changes.

Yet the mainstream media, policy makers and even most climate scientists (like those of the IPCC) are not helping us achieve a full and accurate understanding of what we face.  (The reasons for that are complex, and I discuss them in the seminar.)  Therefore, I am working to share this information with Maine communities so that they can understand and better prepare for the future.  I have also begun collaboration with several professional counselors – one of whom deals explicitly with issues of denial and despair – to develop ways to help us move past those so that we can accomplish what needs to be done quickly – shock-proofing our systems to meet our basic needs – because time is of the essence.

By synthesizing ideas that I have studied and taught for over a decade, I have developed this seminar - Climate 101 : Understanding Abrupt Climate Change Using System Sciences and Geophysiology – to help people who are not scientists as well as scientists and educators understand these issues.  It offers crucial perspectives that – for reasons explained below – are not yet available in this integrated format anywhere else, including Maine colleges and universities.  I’ve designed it as a 12-hour seminar that can be offered as a weekend intensive or stretched over several weeks. I can also offer versions ranging from 6 to 15 hours or more, followed by more advanced seminars.

The seminar explains abrupt climate change using easy-to-understand principles of system sciences and geophysiology, the scientific study of Earth as a self-regulating system called Gaia, without which one cannot fully understand climate change.   Gaia theory and geophysiology – or “planetary physiology”, sometimes called Earth Systems Science – are science, not religion or mysticism.   They are studied and taught in Britain and parts of Europe at major educational institutions and prestigious climate research institutions.   The concepts taught in the seminar are understandable – rationally and intuitively – by adults with any background, including no science, and will significantly expand one’s understanding of how human systems, nature and life work.

Briefly, Gaia is the name that James Lovelock and the late Lynn Margulis – founders of Gaia theory - gave to Earth’s planetary-scale metabolism (complex chemistry like occurs in our cells) and homeostasis, the automatic self-regulation of the temperature and chemical composition of Earth’s atmosphere and oceans, that works much like your homeostasis that automatically maintains your temperature, pressure, and the chemical composition of your body, like water, sugars, fats, amino acids, hormones, antibodies, salts, etc.  In the seminar, I briefly describe those in terms of organisms like humans, then encourage one to “scale up the ideas” to understand Gaia.  (A longer essay by me about Gaia is here.)

Other concepts in the seminar from system sciences required to understand Gaia and climate change include:

  • feedback, both negative (stabilizing) and positive (accelerating), the latter causing extremely rapid changes in system behavior called phase transitions at critical thresholds (or ‘tipping points’);
  • nonlinearity : I use images to graphically illustrate what that means and why it’s important;
  • system (attractor) states : systems do not behave in just any way, but demonstrate relatively few, discrete behavioral states. For Earth, that’s cold (ice ages), warm (interglacials, like now) and hot (coming); there are no stable “in between” states;
  • the theory of emergence (‘the whole is greater than a sum of its parts’) and non-equilibrium thermodynamics, or NET, the science of energy, energy gradients and energy flows necessary for life.

(More on those ideas and other principles of system sciences is here.)

Those ideas sound technical, but they are easy to understand rationally and intuitively for most adults, even those with no science background.   And they apply to virtually every kind of system at every size scale.  However, these principles are not yet available in most colleges and universities below the graduate level, and rarely – if ever – in the integrated fashion that I offer that are necessary to grasp the ‘big picture’ of Gaia and climate change.  The reasons for their absence in education are complex, but include that universities – like science for the last 200 years – have compartmentalized into separate disciplines like physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, anthropology, economics, medicine, etc, with specialized principles and languages that are often not applicable outside of their purview.  Further, most faculty are trained in reductionism (taking systems apart to study them) and mechanism (looking at nature as a ‘machine’), but lack adequate training in system sciences.

Lovelock – and Margulis until her recent untimely death – are rare scientists that deeply understand systems, who knew that Gaia cannot be understood using reductionism (alone) and mechanism.  They have both argued that climate change is really only a symptom of a much more important problem: disruption of Earth’s metabolism and homeostasis by human activities. Unless we understand Gaia as something that is effectively alive – at least to the extent that it self-regulates (but is not conscious like us) – then we will miss that more important point. If we are to live sustainably on Earth, we must understand Gaia – rationally and intuitively – and make it one of the core ideas of our cultures.

_____________

Finally, here is a bit of background about me. I am an independent educator, not associated with any school or institution (by choice; feel free to ask why). I earned a PhD in ecology and evolution from University of New Mexico in 1990, after which I taught college biology and mathematics full time for 7 years before becoming an independent educator teaching principles of system sciences, life sciences, geophysiology and climate change.

In 2001, I founded a small, independent academy in Oregon where I taught these ideas for ten years before migrating to Maine in 2010 (again, for complex reasons).   More about my background is available here.

I earn my living teaching this and related seminars and courses.  I set my fees on a self-determined, sliding scale to make them available to as many as possible.  Whereas my introductory overview lecture is free, my requested minimum fee for the full, 12-hour seminar is $75, but I invite larger contributions so that I can offer scholarships.   Thus, if you are unable to pay $75 but want to attend, please contact me about scholarship information.

I have offered my seminar in Maine three times so far – in Lewiston, Skowhegan and Brooks. [Update: May 3: I've now offered it an additional 3 times in Waterville and Dexter; I am about to start two more in Waterville.  More are in the works for summer, 2012.]  It has received strong positive reviews.   Even though some of the news is not good, I promise you an interesting, engaging set of presentations that will change your understanding of just about everything, including life itself, and help you understand how to better move into the future.   If you have questions about it – topics, format, etc – or if you would like to read some reviews and/or communicate about it with some former participants, please contact me.

Sincerely,

Alder Stone Fuller
Waterville, ME

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

1, 2, 3 …

The new year arrived
on the 22nd.

A few …
well, a lot,
will celebrate it
2 days from now.

OK.  Whatever.

After that, 2012
will have ‘officially’ arrived.

Here we go.

One, two, three …

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Gaia 101 & Gæa school

Meadow by the river

For two to three hours on most days since mid-July, I have walked in a little piece of Gaia, the name of Earth’s metabolism and homeostasis: a meadow along the river below my studio near Skowhegan, Maine.  It is populated by grasses, ferns, goldenrod, milkweed, blueberries, alders and pines, dragonflies dining on mosquitoes, a new beaver pond on a brook draining to the river – where water meets rock, air and life – all under an awesome sky with air and clouds that have brushed the Arctic.

While walking amidst that life, and in other beautiful places during my one year plus in Maine, I ask myself this: how does one best convey the concept of Gaia to others?

During the last six months, I’ve spent the biggest portion of my time developing a new seminar to do just that. It’s called Gaia 101 : A Story of Gaia.  (I’m also fond of the spellings Gaea or Gæa, which are pronounced effectively the same.)  This post is about its debut in both ‘live‘ (in-person) and online formats, and its relationship to two other projects: Gæa school and The Adaptability Project.

I have designed Gaia 101 to convey a deep and intuitive sense of the scale, speed and severity of the 1-in-50 million year climate change event that has begun, and the systems sciences needed to understand both Gaia and climate change.  In fact, let me state that differently for emphasis: one cannot – cannot - fully comprehend climate change outside of a context of systems sciences and geophysiology – the science of Gaia.  Period.  Gaia 101 addresses all three topics.

Briefly – with much more on the Gaia 101 pages -
there are three coupled parts to the seminar:

  1. systems sciences that are necessary to understand …
  2. geophysiology - the science of Gaia, and …
  3. climate change, which can only be fully understood
    from a perspective of geophysiology and systems sciences.

I think that this is the most relevant and important seminar I’ve ever developed;  I’ll address that more below.  It is also is the core of a book and DVD that are in the queue.

So far, I’ve offered Gaia 101 once in person – the inaugural run, last spring in the ‘experimental college’ at Bates College in Lewiston, Maine, a program designed for courses by non-faculty community members.  It received strong positive reviews from those who participated; you’ll find a couple of those on the Gaia 101 pages.

I am planning to offer it in person – ‘live’ – multiple times in coming months  in the Skowhegan, Maine area, then expand out from there next spring.   I am setting up free introductory overview presentations.  I’ll announce those in my calendar and elsewhere.

In a live format, Gaia 101 is roughly 10-hours long – that includes lectures, lots of Q & A and discussion.   It can be offered in a weekend intensive or stretched over a month.

After several delays – including a complex, months-long transition to a new town, I’m formally launching the online version of the seminar this week.

The online version takes the form of four slide shows – a free introductory overview plus one slide show per part – all enhanced with LOTS of imagery and recorded narration, along with online discussions via pages on this site, email and/or telephone.

With some minor constraints, there are no set dates and times for entry, participation or completion of the online version.  Unlike an in-person, ‘live’ class, there are no specific meeting days and times. Participants move at their own pace, taking as much time as desired for reading, listening, study and reflection, questions and discussion with me and other participants.  For an average person, that will probably represent about 10 – 15 hours over a month or two.  The duration could be more or less depending on one’s desired level of understanding.

__________

Gaia 101 – or Gæa 101 – has become the introduction, or portal, into my entire curriculum of introductory and advanced courses and seminars because all concepts in my curriculum – the principles of systems or Gaia sciences – are represented in an introductory, yet integrated way in Gaia 101.   And that’s because understanding and intuiting Gaia and climate change requires at least a rudimentary understanding of all of those principles.  The better one understands them, the better one understands Gaia.

Taking this a step further, Gaia 101 is also the first course in – the entry or portal to – a new educational concept – a project – called Gæa school.

Gæa school is not a building or place – note that I am purposefully not capitalizing the word ‘school’ as a place name – but a concept, an idea that I hope will become a global, distributed curriculum without walls.  Or to put it differently, Gæa school can manifest live or online within any set of walls, whether a college, community center, house, yurt, a cob or bamboo hut, a dome, an igloo or … no walls at all.

Falls downstream from the meadow, where air, water, rock & life intersect.

In fact, Gaia must sometimes be studied without walls, in a forest, meadow, shrub steppe or desert, by a marsh, pond, river or a seashore.

Gæa school will be grounded in science and rational thinking, but not restricted to it.  We must use all ways of knowing to know Gaia: thinking, intuition, sensing and feeling, using science, art and myth. More on that below …

Both Gaia 101 and Gæa school are also integral parts of another project that I’ve been developing with the help of others for a couple of years: The Adaptability Project, or TAP.

TAP has been designed to help people understand the scale, speed and severity of the climate change that has begun, and to prepare for it on individual, family, neighborhood, community and regional scales by increasing our adaptability via shock-proofing systems to meet basic needs like water, food, shelter and energy.   (Note that I used the word “adaptability” rather than “adaptation”; the difference is not trivial.)  I’ll be writing more about TAP in coming weeks and months …

________

OK, back to the importance of Gaia 101 and Gaia – or Gæa - in general.

Here’s a bold assertion.  Gaia is THE most important idea for humans to understand as we move forward to face the great challenges of the 21st century.   It’s more important than economics, politics, human health care, and terrorism … combined.  Our understanding of it will influence the survival of our species more than those other issues.

Why? For multiple reasons.

First, because everything that happens on Earth – including economics, politics and your life, and I mean the very fact that you are alive – occurs in the context of Gaia. Without Gaia, there would be no economics or politics.  Without Gaia, neither you nor any other living entity would exist on Earth.

Gaia is Earth’s planetary-scale metabolism and homeostasis that automatically – without conscious intention, just like your homeostasis – maintains the temperature and chemical composition of Earth’s air and waters at conditions suitable for life.

Physics, chemistry and biology are necessary but not sufficient to explain how that happens. That is, physics and chemistry alone cannot fully explain why, for example, oxygen has existed at levels greater than 18% but less than 24% of Earth’s atmosphere (by volume) for 300 million years; why ocean pH is slightly alkaline; how sulfur cycles from ocean back to land; or  many other aspects of Earth’s atmosphere and oceans.   Understanding those facts requires geophysiology – the main science of Gaia – in addition to physics, chemistry and biology.

How Gaia regulates those characteristics, and why it can be considered as alive as you are is a central component of Gaia 101.

Here’s another reason that humans must learn to recognize and understand Gaia if our species is to survive. Imagine that you saw all living things – other humans, animals, plants and fungi – as inanimate, non-living objects.   Not as living, self-regulating entities, but simply part of your “environment” - that abominable twentieth century label for that which is outside of ourselves.   You would be less prone to treat them with respect in a way that promotes their health and integrity. But because people know that those entities are alive, they are more prone to treat them respectfully in a way that promotes their health.

The same must be true for Gaia, because our actions during the last few centuries have made it ill – it is running a ‘fever’ called global warming, indicative of disruption of its homeostasis – and its illness will accelerate during this century. If we cannot rationally and intuitively understand that Gaia is alive – a planetary-scale life form with a metabolism and homeostasis that self-regulates, just as any other living entity – then we will continue to abuse it, and ultimately make conditions on Earth unsuitable for humans and many other species.

Goblet or faces?

Seeing Gaia as alive – as a planetary-scale living entity – will require a fundamental shift in perspectives, a phase transition in the language of systems sciences.   That shift is metaphorically represented by the image to the left.  Depending on how and where one focuses, one sees either a goblet or a silhouette of two faces looking at each other. By allowing one’s vision to shift, one can switch between the two images, but it is difficult to see both simultaneously

Now, and for the last few centuries, we have seen that which is outside of ourselves as ‘the environment’.   We see living animals and plants, and inanimate rocks, water and clouds, but most – especially in the modern western world – cannot yet perceive Gaia as a living whole composed of both living and non-living components, even conceptually in our mind’s eye.

We must learn how to shift our perception to perceive it as a planetary-scale living entity.   Our comprehension of a living Gaia – within which we live – must become both  rationally and intuitively understood, as common to our everyday consciousness as recognizing life in other humans.

Here’s another metaphor.   It is inappropriate and disrespectful to view a lover as merely a collection of parts, such as eyes, lips, breasts, hips, legs and genitalia. We must see lovers – and all people – as wholes, even while paying attention, at appropriate times, of course, to individual parts.

Likewise, with Gaia, we must pay proper attention to the parts – organisms, rocks, water, air, energy, ecosystems – but also be able, to borrow a phrase from Robert Heinlein, to grok the whole.   We must be able to simultaneously see the parts and the whole, an emergent entity that is bigger than the parts.

Yet a third metaphor, perhaps most succinct: just as we are sometimes guilty of not seeing a forest for the trees, we are in danger of not seeing Gaia for the forests.

________

Given the importance of Gaia explained above, my goal is to offer Gaia 101 to thousands, and to teach it to other teachers so that they can teach thousands of others, and so on.

To make it available to as many as possible, the seminar fees are set on a sliding scale. My goal is to offer it free while still helping support myself with it since teaching is my ‘day job’.  To help with that goal, I am also seeking outside funding (e.g., from philanthropists).

I hope that you will join us for Gaia 101 : A Story of Gaia, and that you will be contributing to the concept of Gæa school as it evolves.

__________

In a later post, I want to address how we can begin to grasp the full sense of Gaia.

By ‘full sense’, I mean using all four components of knowing: sensing, feeling, intuition and thinking, to borrow Stephen Harding’s idea from chapter 1 of Animate Earth: Science, Intuition & Gaia (which I use as a text in one of my Gaia seminars).

Gaia 101 offers an excellent entry into the ‘thinking’ and ‘intuition’ parts of knowing Gaia.  In a later post, I want to address the sensing and feeling aspects of it.

Posted in Climate, Education, Gaia, Personal, Science, Systems | Leave a comment

It’s raining

Here’s a first exercise for Gaia school. Please think of this as a fun learning exercise; no grades will be assigned. ;-)

I’ve posted this exercise in several places – Goggle +, Facebook and this blog – to see what kinds of responses are offered. I’ll offer my response at a later time, along with my motivation for both my response and for posing the exercise. Even though I hope the exercise will be interesting and fun, the point that I hope to make with it is not trivial.

Here it is. Outside my window, it’s raining. (Well, it was when I posted this.) In one or two complete sentences – they can be long and complex, but preferably with good punctuation – explain what that means, including what “it” is.

Registered users of this site can enter a response in a comment. (Comments are moderated, so they will not appear immediately.) Others can send responses by email.
________

While you’re working on this exercise, I’m going to draft another post about “Gaia school” – the concept and potential evolution – and the primer course that I’ve developed as the main entry-level focus for Gaia school:  my new seminar Gaia 101 : A Story of Gaia, offered both online and in person (mostly in central Maine for now).

I have designed that seminar so that students in the school can understand what Gaia is, what it is not, and the multiple ways that we study it, with sciences – especially systems sciences and geophysiology – being the main but not only modes.

Posted in Education, Science | 2 Comments

Gaia school

Technically, it began today.

Practically, it will begin tomorrow, or the next day.

Gaia has been living continuously for more than 3,500 million years.

It can wait another day or five for humans to begin study.

Please stay tuned …

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ch, ch, ch, changes

To coincide with the evolution of a major project on which I’m collaborating with several others – soon hopefully to be many others – I’m making some changes to this site.

First, the site tagline (subtitle) has changed from “Systems Sciences, Life Sciences, Geophysiology & Climate Change” to “The Sciences & Mathematics of Gaia”. I’m not 100% sure it’s going to remain exactly the same, but that’s close. The transition is not merely cosmetic or whimsical, but represents a fundamental change in my understanding of what my work (and this site) is about; the content hasn’t changed substantively, but my framing of it has.

Second, I’m moving the current home page – my letter of introduction  - to a new menu item called “Introduction”. The new home page will include:

  • Site logline
  • Site updates like new posts, essays, projects, courses (including online: coming soon), current calendar items, etc
  • Ideas, quotes & links of the week/month
  • Other stuff I haven’t thought of yet …

Please stay tuned: work in progress …

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

New essays, online courses & a course at Bates College

Here is an overdue update about:

  • three new essays about life and climate change
  • a set of online courses about basic system principles
  • a short course on climate change at Bates College (Lewiston, ME)

New essays

In the last few weeks, I have published
three new essays in the “essays” section of this web site.

  • What is life? Part 2 : The details of a major new scientific definition and understanding of life emerging from the addition of several principles of systems sciences – self-organization in dissipative systems, autopoiesis, emergence, symbiogenesis and Gaia theory – to knowledge from cell/molecular biology.
  • Facing & Surviving Climate Change with Honest Hope :
    Quotes from Lawrence Gonzales, Dianne Dumanoski and James Lovelock
    that help motivate facing climate change in a realistic way – neither sugar coating the truth nor turning away in fear and denial because we have no time for fear and denial if we are to prepare to meet the challenges ahead.

I am especially pleased with What is life? Part 2. It feels like one of the best essays I’ve ever written. (Or is it the most important one I’ve written?) I took great pains to be as complete, clear and concise as possible. In about 6 – 7 printed pages (from a word processor), it explains the essence of how systems sciences helps us understand life in awe-inspiring new ways, that has the potential to significantly affect how we view and think of ourselves as life forms.

I am working on What is life? Part 3 : Cognition & consciousness,
and why life necessarily had to evolve before consciousness.
I anticipate publishing it in May or June.

Online courses

I am excited to announce that I am developing a set of online courses about basic systems sciences principles. They will be adapted from the following existing courses (which I have taught repeatedly on location, but not yet in an online format):

Enrollment for the courses will begin in mid- to late May.

Climate change course at Bates

Bates College in Lewiston, ME offers an interesting program to its students called Experimental College. In it, members of the community who are not Bates faculty can teach courses. I proposed a 5-week short course about type II climate change from a perspective of systems sciences and geophysiology (Gaia theory).

The course is an adaptation of this set of seminars that I intend to offer on my summer “downeast” tour (details coming), shortened a bit to fit into a smaller time slot and to leave time for discussions. Students enroll strictly on the basis of interest; they earn no credit for the course. (I actually like that, because it insures that the students are there for the “right” reasons: an interest in learning.)

My proposal was accepted. Several students are enrolled – five so far – and we begin classes this week. We will meet twice per week for 1.5 hours each day. I am excited to teach this  course and  use the experience to hone the seminars for my tour.

Click the link below for a one-page pdf course description.

Understanding abrupt, chaotic, large-scale climate change

Posted in Climate, Education, Site, Systems | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment